Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Time for some Real News

I think I first discovered CNN.com the night George W. Bush beat John Kerry to remain President. It's not forever, but it's been a while. For some time, now I've also had the New York Times bookmarked, but CNN has been the first place I click for news. No more. CNN's reign as my go-to news source has come to an end and I have removed it from my bookmark menu entirely (I know, I could just as easily type "CNN" in my address bar, but I won't. I live by my bookmarks). My news will now come from the NY Times and BBC News. Why the change? Well, to put it simply, I only have time for real news.

This change has been a long time coming. It probably began the day I sent an angry email to CNN about the pictures on their front page. If I want to see stills from Paris Hilton's latest commercial, in which she is either completely or nearly (I can't remember which it was) nude, I'll click on a link to a story with that title. I don't need the picture to show up just because I decided to visit CNN's front page. It was furthered by the summer I spent in a house with Cable, in which I realized that CNN Headline News never has any real news on and never has anything I want to watch. The other CNN channel was much better, but they did have a nail-biter of a presidential primary to cover at the time. I got closer to the edge when Michael Jackson's death became a multiple-months event rather than the brief, if significant, story it should have been. Once I realized that if I see a story on CNN, I immediately click over to the NYT to see whether they're covering it too and thus decide whether it's worth reading, the decision was pretty much made.

I had a conversation with friends a few weeks ago in which one person, who reads what I would consider fairly significant news outlets, related a revelation she'd had when cut off from the internet for a few weeks. She spends hours of each day reading nearly everything that's available in the news. And she knows very little about anything of significance in the real world. I'd like for what I take the time to know to be politically, economically or historically significant. For that, I need a legitimate news source.

I'm a strong believer in not supporting things you don't agree with. I actively avoid shopping at certain stores because I don't approve of their business practices and I don't find their products worth my money (definitely a rant for another day). Similarly, I will not click on stories that I don't find worth the time spent writing them. I'm tired of Sarah Palin, and except for the day she announced her resignation, I haven't clicked on a single headline with her name in it since John McCain lost. For a long time, I have resisted CNN's penchant for celebrity gossip over news by refusing to click on stories that I don't think merit the front page. And I'm increasingly disgusted by the contents of their "most popular" articles section. Just as much of America seems to live in blissful ignorance that a war in Africa really is more important than who wore what to the Oscars, I am now choosing to remain ignorant of what stories America chooses to read on the "news." I don't want to know that John Gosselin's announcement that he loves his new girlfriend more, Ellen DeGeneres' appointment to American Idol, and Chris Brown's fight with Oprah are more important to a "news source" than a hijacked plane in Mexico. I used to think that if I wanted celebrity gossip, I would go to People Magazine. Now I realize I can accomplish one-stop shopping at CNN, except that the "hard news" may be difficult to find amidst all the insignificant but still sensational goings on of such newsworthy topics as the "Crasher Squirrel" web frenzy.

There are legitimate, significant things going on in the world today. They are of political, economic and historical importance. And maybe most Americans don't want to hear or read about them. But I do. So I will "vote with my feet", or in this case my clicker finger and head to a news source that tells me what's happening in the real world, and not the sensationalized celebrity world. I hope a few of the advertising dollars that seek my attention will follow me.

::Melanie steps down off her soapbox and resumes normal life.::

3 comments:

  1. I still hold to my suggestion of reading http://news.bbc.co.uk/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ha! Totally true. Although it's nice to know where to go for a quick 'what's up in hollywood today' journey!

    ReplyDelete